Hospitals with Post-Acute Services Produce Better Outcomes than SNFs

At first, the conclusion seems obvious: Hospitals that sink more money into post-acute services provide better care to patients than their lower-spending counterparts. But those findings, released this week by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, have stark implications for skilled nursing providers.

“We find that patients who go to hospitals that rely more on skilled nursing facilities after discharge, as opposed to getting them healthy enough to return home, are substantially less likely to survive over the following year,” Joseph Doyle, the MIT School of Management professor who coauthored the recent hospital study, told MIT News.

Doyle and his coauthors — Jonathan Gruber, an MIT economics professor, and Vanderbilt University health policy professor John A. Graves — set out to investigate wasteful health care spending, noting that the United States shells out 40% more on medical expenses than its nearest counterpart.

The group tracked mortality statistics for more than 1.5 million Medicare patients aged 66 and older at a variety of different hospitals between 2002 and 2011, and made some startling conclusions about the efficacy post-acute SNF care. Patients at hospitals that spent more money on third-party skilled care had a higher one-year mortality rate by five percentage points, while hospitals achieved a two-percentage-point reduction in deaths for every $8,500 they spent on in-house care.

“We see this as a potentially novel quality measure for hospitals,” Doyle told MIT News. “Hospitals that have that profile where they send patients to skilled nursing facilities have higher spending downstream, and they have worse outcomes.”

Doyle, Gruber, and Graves then use this conclusion to come up with a policy argument: Given the lower mortality rates, bundled-payment Medicare plans should offer higher reimbursements for inpatient care than external SNF services, they claim.

“If you look at the bundled payments that pay for an episode of care, it’s the composition of spending that matters, since high initial spending and low downstream spending is much better associated with good outcomes,” Doyle told MIT News.

Read the full recap of the research here.

Written by Alex Spanko

Alex Spanko on EmailAlex Spanko on LinkedinAlex Spanko on Twitter
Alex Spanko
Assistant Editor at Aging Media Network
Alex covers the skilled nursing and reverse mortgage industries for Aging Media. Outside of work, he reads nonfiction, yells at Mets games from his couch, and enjoys pretty much any type of whiskey or scotch — often all at once.

Leave a Reply

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. More Information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this. For more information, see our cookie policy.

Close